Standard Grafik

Introduction
Here I gather all my thoughts related to my graphics production
I seek freedom, not challenge, I have an assortment of styles I use and that is that.




Vedurs Standard Graphics Style List
For every style there is a person I associate the most with it, who did it best, who did it with intention, or both.
I use the list below and think no further, excentric styles are not for me.
Sexy graphics rawr, catty.
To punga in or punga ut, that is the question.
types: 1. begrenzt/süß 2. Skizzieren/Bruks 3. Dedikation/HQ
Effectors: Scanned, construction levels, detail level, digital, Raster, Cluttered, Spacey

Palettes
* Natural Palette with accents
* Flat and integrated palette
* High Contrast Saturation pump palette
* Open Mind Palette

2D:
1. Minimalism
1.5 Süßkissen
2. Gouache/watercolor sketch
2. Bruks photos
3. HQ photos
2/3. Ligne Claire
2/3. Rough Comics
3. Oil Painting

3D:
1.5. Feltwerk photogrametry/Gouache 3D
1.5 Feltwerk photogrametry/Gouache 3D
2. bruks Photogrametry/Gouache 3D
3/4. Photoreal photogrammetry/Gouache 3D
2/4. Voxel rendering/Point-cloud-rendering

Video/Photography:
1. CCTV camera
2/4. Basic Camera Setup
3/4 Advanced Camera setup





The indie software scene
The indie software scene and E/Web has always been dominated by bruksgrafik and bruksljud.
It is where creativity thrives.


Unthoughtthrough Graphics
It's bothersome how unoptimized and un-thought-through much of todays graphics are.
Graphics that are neither bruks or dedication.
Minimalism with ubershaders that look like nothing and burns your computer.
Texel density can be quite garbage in supposedly dedication tier graphics.


DOS, PS1, Nintendo DS
The PS1, DOS PC, and Nintendo DS are aesthetically my favorite platforms.
Those platforms have timeless bruks tier graphics for every single title, no exceptions.
PS2, XBOX, XBOX 360, PS3, Gamecube, N64 they all aimed too high.
They tried to hide digital artifacts through blur.
They were ashamed of what they were, and that is what ruined them.
I love how the indie software scene embraced bruks aesthetics.
Unashamed pixelation and digitalness.
We need way more of that, way less half arsed attempts at realism/dedication.


Making Textures
* Generally low/mid contrast
* Avoid white roof/black floor
* Generally, texture! not form! super common mistake, people try to put rocks, handles, windows on a texture, in begrenzt graphics styles you sometimes do that
* in case of painting, detail on every level, block, blotch, fine, micro
* GO, gesture occlusion, map


Location
I only have real world locations, that is something I got from Tintin. I do not see the point in fictive locations.
It keeps everything together real nice.

3D-Graphics technique list
! DON'T DO FAA
! DON'T DO MASS TEXTURE FILTERING(sometimes texture filtering is cool, just don't do it all the damn time)
! I WANT THE CRISP
! IF YOU'RE NOT DOING REALISM FOCUS ON GEOMETRIC READABILITY & FUNCTIONALITY
! AVOID BAKED LIGHTNING, THINGS MOVE, DOES NOT ADD ENOUGH GEOMETRIC READABILITY TO JUSTIFY
Texture smoothing and anti aliasing are one of those things I always want to be able to turn off.
* Flat lightning, only direct lightning, no global illumination
* Multi sample anti aliasing = removes jagged edges, expensive.
* Cone-tracing = sort of like ray tracing but cones instead.
* Local-illumination = boxes that control the ambient lightning of rooms/spaces. for example: blue = outside, dark grey = inside, cheap, cheap, cheap, very unrealistic
* Depth occlusion = Not realistic, improves geometric readability.
* illumination boxes priority
* Atmosphere/fog = makes things fade into the atmosphere over distance.
* crevass Occlusion/coloring = makes crevasses darker/colored, cheap.(Don't overdo this everything will look like skrottnisse)
* Ray tracing = calculates light bouncing, expensive as hell.
* Bloom = smudges the are around light hitting the camera
* gradient textures = good for giving form readability to textureless objects
* Noise gradient textures = same as above
* Paralaxx shaders = good for textures with depth, grass, gravel
* skyboxes = good for worm backgrounds that don't move
* chunksum billboards = good for chunks that are far away and at a similar angle.
* Micro Detail Sunbleaching

Rendering techniques
When I am doing bruks tier photogrametry there are a couple of favorite graphic techniques I use to achieve dynamics, beauty, speed, functionality.
* Direct lightning = objects get illuminated and cast shadow based on light sources in the scene, absolute classic
* Local Illumination:
* cheap
* Boxes that control local lightning.
* Have a priority index.
* room ambient color generally has a lower priority index than outside lighting.
* Depth occlusion boxes = make things slightly darker in a specificed direction within the box to increase geometric and spatial readability, priority over outside lightning
good for foilage, boxes, crevasses, holes
* Depth bright boxes = good for fires, light holes
* Gradient textures = helps with geometric readability.
* Ambient occlusion = expensive, but does enhance gemoetric and spatial readability quite a bit.
* multi layer foilage
* multi billboard foliage
* low res texture combined with high res noise, micro texture
* High Resolution textures + maximizing model joining(Harry Potter 1-4)
* Intersection filtering
* Fauna fields


Filters
I think filters are a good tool for the photographer to make their photos more assertive.
Filters in combination with standard color language can be a tool for telling the viewer how to feel about the content.
Magenta = Seriousness
Contrast boost(no saturation boost) = seriousness
Saturation pump = playfullness
Neutral = science
Boosted reds = love, romance
Low Saturation = bleakness, misery
Selective boosts = forwardness, formality, hope, hiearchy
Warm Dark(Fantasy-24) = epic, Fantasy, fever dream, dreamish
BW = Death, tradegy



Metaphoric Minimalist UI
Metaphors is essential for quick orientation in any application.
* Tool/place metaphors
* Smallest unit
* Balanced contrast
* Separation through value first, line second


Making 3D objects look more together
* Intersection smoothing
* Ambient Intersection bounces
* Contact occlusion


Texture Filtering New Statement
I have said that texture filtering for low resolution textures isn't bruks but you know what,
If you following the rules of good texturing I do not mind the filtering.
Removing texture filtering starts looking good at those low LODs, LOD 2.
Mario 64 looks better without texture filtering.
I don't want to imagine minecraft with texture filtering.
yeah yeah.
LOD 2: no texture filtering
LOD 1.5>: Texture filtering
I believe that texture filtering comes in two types though:
* Non destructive for detailed textures, blurs pixel edge less that one pixel, grass, sand, wood, anything grainy
* Destructive for textures that are more gesture, like water or sky, blur greater than one pixel
So a texture should be marked as either being either gesture or grainy.
Proper Anti Aliasing!
The reason why you don't do texture filtering above LOD 2 is because it cost processing power.
and compability tends to becoem priority then.
but you can do texture filtering there also!
So,
compability:
* no texture filtering
Bruks:
* ~0.3 blur for grainy textures
* 1+ blur for gesture textures



Common Photogrametry Levels
Remember it is a spectrum!
Conmpability/Feltwerk:
* LOD 2
* Map sketchers probably like feltwerk the most, fastest to sketch in
* Counter Strike, Day of Defeat
* Blocky models, hence the name feltwerk.
* pixelated textures
* Flat lightning
* No AA
* Somewhat goofy and unimmersive
* You can do AA and texture filter if you want, looks good as well
* pop-in LODs
Bruks/semi-realism:
* Highly immersive
* LOD fades
* 4x MSAA(I refuse anything less than that, I will lower the screen resolution rather than give this up)
* LOD 1.5
* Models are not blocky and do NOT look like paper fold art, though they are slightly edgy. If something looks like paper fold art that isn't a distance-LOD you are doing something wrong.
* LOD is higher on smaller models
* Counter Srike: Source, Flight Simulator: X, Day of Defeat: Source, Skywards Sword HD, Battlefront II
* Billboards/shell shading for particles
* Blend of HD textures and mid-textures
* non-realistic, but very pretty shaders
* AA
Realism: * LOD 1
* Sleek, photoreal models
* Fully detailed particle systems
* HD textures
* realistic lightning model




Animation
* Keyframes
* Interpolation:
* Linear for smooth easy movements(idling, grabbing,)
* acceleration and deacceleration for faster movements(walking, running, climbing, rotating)


Simple photogrametry
! SHOULD RUN ON A BRUKS TIER SYSTEM!
* LOD 2-1.5 vertex density
* LOD 1-2 texture resolution
* NO anti aliasing
* NO texture smoothing
* NO real time ray tracing
* direct lightning
* NOISE TEXTURES
You can have GSCO on a rendering level or on a texture level.
* GSCO = Geometric/Spatial clarity Occlusion(depth gradient boxes, wall gradients, front2back gradients, contact shading, )
* Textures, preferably a bit flat, not extreme contrasts
* Simpler lightning systems(light boxes, geometric and spatial clarity oclusion)
* A balance between resolution, shader realism, and model quality(I see a lot, A LOT of mismatch between model quality and display resolution, why are you displaying these low poly models at 4k with ray tracing, why?)
BRUKSLEVEL AND PIXELPHOBIA DO NOT BLEND!
* Light boxes
* Shadow boxes
* LOD pop-ins(avoiding pop-ins belongs more to 3/4)




What level to use?
We definetely live in a time(2025) where there is too much obsession with photorealism.
Photorealism has a time and place, and it isn't always.
I want more bruks level graphics, focus on story and communication, not realism.
I like the Clone Wars series because it doesn't look like the product of some photorealism obsessed savant with access to a rendering farm.
100% focus on story.
I also like SFM animations.
I really just want the PS2 era but with higher resolution, quit all this photorealism OCD.
You know watching a vlog in 4k60fps OLED truecolor 360 audio stabilizer is just so overkill.
1080p + camera microphone, bam.
DON'T GO OVERKILL, GO BRUKS MAN!


Computer Graphics Eras
Computer graphics have progressed from limited, to bruks, to dedication and here I label where the transitions happened:
Limited: 1960-2000(NES/SNES, PS1, N64,DOS PC)
Bruks: 2000-2007(PS2/PS3, XBOX/X360, Gamecube, Wii standard PCs, DirectX9-11, OpenGL)
Dedication: 2010-2025(PS4, XBOX ONE, Gaming PCs, DirectX12, Vulkan, Mantle)


Left hand vs Right hand
Something that helped me learn how to use the right hand was thinking of the pen as a mouse.
Just like I access the computer with a mouse in my right hand I access the paper with a pen in the right hand.
Try it out I recommend.




View Distance to Width Ratio
For art to be viewed as the artist intended you should have a "view distance to width ratio" in the metadata of the art.
For example a small painting has a size of 30cmx30cm and is viewed originally from 50cm.
It can be made bigger, but the ratio must be maintained.
50/30
100/60


Simple Photogrammetry Expression
Simple photogrammetry has that japanese style philosophy to it.
Ease of expression, simplicity and freedom over realism.
The style bends to the artist rather than the artist bending to the style.
What is also nice in this art style is that the job of reducing the scene to the relevant abstract elements is already done, less processing for the person.
The graphics of the 00s could have been as catty as the PS1 if they didn't add all that FAA and texture smoothing making it into a blurry mess in the name of making it "realistic"
The push for realism in the 00s was a mistake, makes me think of the N64 with those horrible smooth textures.


pre-texture-colors
I like the 3D-model to be wood colored and particles to be paperbits when I have not added textures yet
and the world background is my work room.


Süßfigur
Begrenzt tier.
A Süßfigur isn't a style or anything, it's just what I call small figures that are easily replicable.
They have a very simple figure and a very simple face.
Such as:
* Toon Zelda Characters
* MIIs
* Animal Crossing Characters
* Matrjosjka


PFPs
Profile pictures are supposed to carry the soul of the individual, so I prefer them to be sketch or dedication tier.


Superfluous
Don't make your graphics, code, music superfluous.
Everything does not have to be AAA graphics
Everything does not have to be C coded hyperefficent
Everything does not have to be 20khz real recordings
Everything does not have to be 4k 44khz audio 60fps video
BRUKS, BRUKS, BRUKS AND MORE BRUKS!


Paint Brushes n pencils
ALWAYS RELATE BACK TO THIS WHEN DOING DIGITAL PAINTING.
wide brush = color blocking
blotchbrush = color blocking smaller objects/shading
pen = shading/details n texture
Hair strand brush = fine shading
2D painting LODs:
LOD 4: 5cm brush, mega block brush(blocking ~10cm^2)
LOD 3: 1cm brush, brush(blocking areas ~1cm^2)
LOD 2: 0.3cm brush, Blotches(color shift on a rock)
LOD 1: 1mm brush, Fine details(Hairstrands, edges, wrinkles) LOD 0: 0.5mm paper/noise, Micro details(Surface roughness)



Painting/Sketching Workflow
1. Construction(2D, 2D+3D, 3D, tubes, muscle implications, skeletons)
2. Block
3. Gradients
4. Bevels
5. blotches
6. Fine details
For micro details I always use texture/noise files, in the same color as the object

Digital Gouache Emulation
Ocean Waves
Have lots of noise if the texture is grainy, have less noise if the texture is very fine, highlights and shadows tend to lack noise even in grainy textures
layers:
top: Sketch layer
mid2: thicc paint details
mid: watercolor blocks(Colors preferably a bit wavey)
bottom: Noisy paper
Pseudo Tools:
* color pencil
* blotch brush
* blob brush
* wide brush
* Vegetation brush
* Spray



Pixel Shaming
In the rush to be able to claim "photorealistic" graphics first developers would blur things to hide the digital artifacts.
This reduces detail, but increases photorealism, since you see blur in photographs more than pixels.
Pixel shaming has ruined many consoles and games and made their graphics unsexy.
If you want to blur everything in the name of photorealism you should do that on a display level, not on a render level.
I want those sexy pixels.
Maybe I would do a post process blur, or CRT-hardware blur at most for boomers who are pixelphobes.


TSAA
I really like TSAA, texture smoothing anti-aliasing.
Some developers use texture smoothing on everything for some reason and that really bothers me.
texture smoothing only works as anti-aliasing where there is supposed to be smooth gradients instead of blotches.
if you add texture smoothing to a grass texture those grass strains are not de-aliased, they straight up dissapear.


Worthy Mentions
* Rough Comics(Disney, Newgrounds, Bully, Skull kid, Super Meat Boy, Minecraft Logo) = Sketching, technical sketchs, Storyboards, day2day, animation, world building, furries, this or ahlbom whatever is your taste
* Mark Ferrari(Amazing colors, amazing craftsmanship, good composition)
* Yotsuba


Use case for pixelart/rasterart
Pixelart/rasterart has traits that can be advantegous in certain situations lets go through a couple:
* Low resolution display
* Low storage capacity
* Low capacity graphics card
* phyiscal grid medium, shirt sewing, plops, tiles, panes.
* Fast sketching, bruks


My growing love for SVGs
At first I didn't like them, too hard to make, though once I started feeling like I understood the software I started really liking svgs.
SVGs can be used to make dynamic pixelart using a translator.
I didn't think SVGs were good for sketching, but I've started doing that as well in SVGs, once you can make them with speed it is fun and also it requires low storage capacity/bruks.


Fonts
* Times New Roman = "Extra" titles font, bread-text-font
* Arial = Titles Font
* Segoe UI = chat/notes font
* Comic Sans = Comics
* Courier New = Code


Gear
* D-Cam with zoom
* !!Manual-settings-maxx!! my latest purchase, zv-1, does not have manual focus in video mode what the h*ck
* 1x-30x zoom(mostly optical, but also digital)
* ~720p 60fps = basic, ~4k 45fps = HQ
* Coolpix b500/b700
* Fixed Zoom Draw Screen(Only change pencil size, to mimic physical medium)
* tripod
* SQUARES PAPER
* Gouache
* Watercolors
* W&N cubes
* pen
* Aseprite
* Blender


2D-LODs
Illustration Resolution = px/cm^2
A common mistake I see people make is to only draw at one LOD-level and thus never develop the ability to make an advanced composition.
0.5cm-squares-paper + sharp pen(0.5cm/16 tip) relative LOD-zones
16px/cm density, 32px/cm. When I do digital art I still think more in terms of centimeters than pixels. "How big is that sword illustration? 8cm at 32px/cm, 1px pen tip,"
Use all of the color bits! Do not hold yourself back!

Be comfortable drawing at different LODs(level of detail)
Be okay with objects only being identifiable through context
Remembering LODs through characters and styles is effective.

The list below is how I orient myself while drawing/sketching:
~square/0.5cm^2: Emojis, cow-blotches, blotch-mario, house-blotches, vegetation-blotches, cloud-blotches, head-blotches, group-blotch (Extremely-far-away/extremely small)
~2^2-squares/1cm^2: blobby SNES characters, SNES, small mario, small Mega Man, small Yoshi, 16px blocks, (far away, small)
~4^2-squares/2cm^2: Thinner/lankier SNES characters, Big mario, Big Yoshi, Big Mega man,(medium)
~8^2-squares/4cm^2: Mulle Meck, Patrick Hines, Simpsons characters, Tintin, (close/big)
~16^2-squares/8cm^2: texture, dedication-level (Very close/very big)
I keep fine tuning these LODs.
A shoutout to Brandon James Greer who also teaches in a LOD increment style.

Another LOD-scale is letter-make-out

3D-LODs
LOD = level of detail:
LOD 7: 1px/vrtx/1km
LOD 6: 1px/vrtx/100m
LOD 5: 1px/vrtx/10m
LOD 4: 1px/vrtx/m
LOD 3: 1px/vrtx/dm,
LOD 2: 1px/vrtx/cm, photorealistic from the corridor
LOD 1: 1px/vrtx/mm, photorealistic on your desk
LOD 0: 1px/vrtx/0.1mm, photoreal right infront of your eye

Another important method of measuring LOD is texel resolution.
How many pixels on the screen does the texture of the object corespond to?
Far away objects can have a low texture LOD, but a high texel LOD because they take up such a small part of the screen.

Chunks
Rendering evrything at once does not work, so we render chunks of different size and resolution:
Massive chunk chunk: 1km
big chunk: 100m
chunk: 10m
small chunk: 1m


Map Designing
1. Paper sketch, theme, style
2. Chunks division, chunk layers
3. software modeling, texturing and lightning






Cameras
Things I like
* 100mm+ zoom level, high zoom levels
* Tripods
* High F-stop
* Bruks tier cameras
* Extra tier cameras
* High shutter speeds
* As high as possible ISO
* Dim/soft lightning
* Saturation pumping
* Contrast pumping




Legos
I do not really like human colored skin in legos.
Imagine if all the yellow simpsons characters became white, that would be weird.
I very much prefer yellow skin color for lego adaptions of white characters.
Yellow Lego star wars figurines from the 90s that's the stuff man.




Design Sheet
Design sheets contain information about the rules of a design, for example:
* 0.5cm borders
* Arial font
* Flat color background
* Separation through value first
* Sharp corners
* Natural Palette
Please use design sheets or stuff gets yanky fast!




Quirkiness
I dislike it when people try to be quirky for the sake of being quirky.
* I dislike quirky games.
* I dislike quirky movies.
* I dislike quirky art.
* I dislike quirky Music.
* I dislike quirky clothes.
* I dislike quirky social structures.
* I dislike quirky food.
* I dislike quirky people.
* I dislike quirky women especially.
* I dislike quirky japanese men especially too.
but also
* I dislike trend emulation in men.(not in women)
It is just disorienting and a waste of time.
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD DO NOT BE A QUIRKYMAXX PERSON.
I get nausea, really bad nausea from the entire "muh style" people.
For the love of god "your style" can go f*ck itself.
Every single "muh style" person I've met was a too-far-up-their-ass demented narcissist hyperautist who needs to touch grass.
It is on the same level of autism as creating new languages.
Maybe funny once in a star wars movie but you are soo damn laate holy sh*t.
You need a damn good excuse to create a new language, and you probably do not have one.
Im very tired of goofers so I want basic style and keeping goof to a minimum.
I think most people have ODed on post-one-world.
The reason why I like the 40s and 50s is because that was the last time people were mentally, graphically, musically, morally in the same world, then everything just became more and more fragmented.
People just chase the hits and get more and more bizarre in their existence.
"that song 'let it go' is popular right now, it's about being yourself, self-satisifed people are boring"
-Hayao Miyazaki.


Inspo
* Tintin by Herge 1 2(behaglig form, great specificity)
* Disney Comics
* PATRICK HINES OMG(Shapes are nice, Strong balance between realism and simplicity, Rendering is effective but not realistic, A style that is accessible to mediocre artists like me)
* Jens Ahlbom(behaglig form, great specificity, men blir ofta DOS ACID colors, scanned art)
* Yotsuba
* Mateuz urbanowizc
* Ralph Mcquarrie(composition, färger, simplistic projections)
* Pippi DOS
* Loranga, Dartanjang och Massarin
* KAMRATPOSTEN KAMRATPOSTEN KAMRATPOSTEN KAMRATPOSTEN KAMRATPOSTEN KAMRATPOSTEN
* Kings Quest scanned Art * All of the above have much in common(simplistic projection, rendering, bruks) but Pat Hines takes the cake as I see it.
* Windows 98